This Christmas, I didn't have a whole lotta moola to sashay around town with - as usual. So I did what comes natural to me. I made things. That's what I do. That's why if you look at my profile, under "occupation" it says "thing-maker". There's also the fact that I've had no luck finding a job, so I can't give myself the illustrious title of Secretary (i.e. Disgruntled Office Kickin-dog). I don't mind being a Thing-Maker. I rather like it actually. I like being able to go into a store, look at a $120 dress, fondle the fabric,
is that a bias cut?, I'd do those sleeves differently, ohmygod what a cheap-ass looking hem!, and walk out knowing that I have a similar pattern at home, cooler fabric, and can whip up a better one this weekend. And for free!
One of the things I made this year was a hat for my nephew with 3 different shades of green yarn. I thought he might like it because the colors came together kind of like camouflage. When he opened it on Christmas, he immediately put it on and didn't take it off for the rest of the time he was at Mamaw's. "So he likes the hat?" I asked my brother. "You see he hasn't taken it off. Green's his favorite color." I did not know that. Maybe I should change my occupation to Psychic Thing-Maker.

I also gave my niece a little pink crocheted tunic I'd made a while back. It was from an old '70s pattern book, so I changed things up and added a ruffle trim around the whole piece with this bizarro yarn called "Wiggles" (looks as if it has little rainbow colored caterpillars crawling through it). And instead of the button placket down the front (since I had the ruffle there - but also the placket looked boring), I put a little tie-closure at the top. I was pleasantly surprised that my niece put on her sweater and wore it home too.

I've said all of that to say this. You may or may not know that I sell some of the things I make online. The majority of items I sell are for babies and children. As of
February 10th, those items will be illegal due to the fact that I (like so many other individual crafters & small businesses) cannot comply with the
Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act's requirement that manufacturers of children's items undergo strict third-party testing & certification before their products can be sold in the United States. Exact figures on third-party testing differ from place to place, but I have read that it can range anywhere from $150 to $5000 per item. I think that might be because each piece of the finished product needs to be tested. For example : a child's jacket would require testing of the fabric, liner, batting, buttons, snaps, zipper, cord, plastic pieces on ends of cord, velcro, thread, elastic, etc. The law applies to any manufacturer of items intended for children 12 or younger. I've thought about just ignoring this cracked-out whacked-out legislation and going on about my business. But then there's the $100,000 fine per violation and up to 5 years imprisonment.
The whole point of the act is to reduce those recalls of
toy police cars for lead paint (manufactured in China). Or those
toy tv recalls - for lead paint (manufactured in Hong Kong).
Toy xylophones for lead paint - manufactured in China.
Floppy Friends Horse Toys - from China.
Toy dinosaurs,
some weird cowboy guy,
Winnie-the-Pooh playsets,
Go Diego Go boats,
various wooden baby toys,
Barbie accessories,
Schylling Thomas & Friends and Curious George tops & pails,
Tinker Bell wands,
ring toss,
Cranium Cadoo Board Games,
Schylling toy robots,
Super Wheels,
Baby Einstein Color Blocks...all of these toys have at least two things in common. They contain excessive levels of lead according to federal standards and they were all manufactured in China.
Then we also have these fun little products to play with and maim ourselves :
Remote-controlled helicopters due to fire and burn hazards - manufactured in China.
Toy barbecue grills for laceration hazard - manufactured in China.
Dive Sticks due to impalement hazard - manufactured in China.
Rage Wireless Guitars for chemical burn risk- manufactured...oh, just guess where. China. I forgot the
doll stroller recalled for severing a child's finger tip and posing possible entrapment hazard.
So, the thing is - if you have the choice of buying your child a toy from a large corporation that imports from a manufacturer in China, a toy with possibly harmful amounts of lead OR something handmade by a local crafter from wood, 100% cotton, wool, and certified non-toxic paints - which would you choose?

I'm only one of a multitude of people who put their heart and soul - and guess what else...Creativity! - into making something other than a slutty little
Bratz doll or annoying singing Elmo. Customers buy handmade because they don't want corporate - they want something different. They want to support local business. Small business. They want recycled, upcycled, natural, unique, original, special order - they don't want another freakin' Bratz doll! What now? Sure, they get the security of knowing they get safe toys...which is great. I'm all for that. Really I am. But they get safe toys from Wal-mart. Toys-R-Us. These cool
play blocks? Nope.
This cute fairy doll? Nada. This kick-ass
owl? Seriously, that's one awesome owl.
Is the whole point of this money? Yes and No. I don't make wads of cash on my shop. It's enough to help with groceries and gas sometimes, but my sales for the past year have been pretty bad to be honest with you. It is the only way I have right now of bringing in any income of my own though. Everything else I exist on is child support. That's an incredibly embarrassing thing to admit. But there it is. It's terribly hard to find a good job (with insurance - and that's imperative due to my medical situation - together my meds are over $1000/month) when you've been home with your kids for so long. No potential employer cares to hear that, no matter how much work children are. Nevertheless, I keep up the Etsy site because ultimately I enjoy making things. I always have. It's one of the few things I can do that I take actual pride in.
I guess in a way it does come down to money, but not in a way that you would think. I grew up not having a lot. Don't get me wrong, there were people who made sure that I was taken care of - but I learned to appreciate much of the do-it-yourselfness that my grandparents' generation possesses. Mamaw worked as a seamstress at a dry cleaner's and used to pick us up at school and take us back to work with her while she finished up. She always let me go through the scraps from altered pants and dresses in the box beside her machine and use them to sew doll clothes. I'll never forget when I was 16 and I put in my first zipper (and made box-pleats!) - I was so excited. When Noah was little I made his pajamas and sweaters and a little pair of pants out of the same fabric that I'd made that first pleated skirt from.
So maybe what I'm trying to really express is some idea of self-reliance. Like a garden, but with fabric and yarn. It is an absolutely wonderful feeling to be able to make your own clothes. And to make clothes for your kids? When some teacher at school says "What a cute dress!" as my daughter gets out of the car in the morning and I hear France reply "Thanks! My mom made it" - well...shit. That's just about the best compliment in the world. But then...to know that there are other people out there. People in Australia or Sweden, even, who think I make cool stuff and want to buy it from me? Wow! However could this have happened?

Do you know how I make my baby shoes? I don't have a pattern. I typically use 100% cotton yarn (manufactured in the U.S. or Canada, depending on the brand) and try to find some funky buttons that will look cool. It's usually in the afternoon, after France gets home and I'm simultaneously helping her with homework. I photograph them in my backyard or around my house, using different props to accent the color scheme. One pair takes up about about 20 minutes of my time and costs me approximately $1.20 in materials. They sell for $8.00 with shipping at a dollar fifty. I think that's a fair profit when sales are good. Still, as you can plainly see, this ain't fucking
Mattel.
I've gone on way too long here...and more so about myself than I originally meant to. I hope I've not downplayed how far-reaching this will be though. It isn't just small online shops like mine that will be affected - it's grandmas selling baby blankets at craft fairs,
local boutiques, guys who make
wooden toys in their garage,
businesses that provide our schools with much needed supplies and science equipment,
Native Americans,
some European toy-makers,
libraries (seriously? what the hell?), and of course
anyone who purchases items for children. Does any of this apply to you? I'm guessing most of you buy something for a kid at one point or another. Do you really want it to be a monstrosity such as this :

My, my...isn't that one of the...well I just don't know what to say about that. Don't worry though, I don't think they're available anymore - they were recalled in August of 2007. Due to lead poisoning hazard. And potential serious night terrors? Manufactured in China, imported by Fisher-Price (a subsidiary of Mattel, the world's largest toy importing company - if you click on the Mattel link a couple paragraphs up you can see that they recalled over 19 million toys in August of 2007 alone). Maybe you can also get an idea about who will be able to afford this testing when you look at their $5.970 billion revenue for 2007. And all for poisoning a bunch of kids with a psychotic drill and other assorted craptastic shit.
Oh yeah, one more thing. This law is retroactive. As of February 10th, any children's item not meeting the new federal standards automatically becomes banned as a hazardous material and must be destroyed regardless of when it was manufactured. National Bankruptcy Day is less than a month away.
Wait, I forgot something else :
There are authorized to be appropriated to the Commission for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act and any other provision of law the Commission is authorized or directed to carry out -
"(A)$118,200,000 for fiscal year 2010;
"(B)$115,640,000 for fiscal year 2011;
"(C)$123,994,000 for fiscal year 2012;
"(D)$131,783,000 for fiscal year 2013; and
"(E)$136,409,000 for fiscal year 2014.So put together how many people are losing income with how much money the new law requires...THIS MAKES SO MUCH DAMN SENSE!
**On January 8th (I started writing this over a week ago - I've been emailing people, calling people, making Saxby Chambliss one of my killer hats to send along with my letter so he can put it on his big old head and think things over, and generally being in bothered/frustrated/Boston-Tea-Party mode) the CPSC voted to exempt some products/people. Electronic products with lead embedded inside are exempt now. Of course if you have a kid who takes those kind of things apart and rubs 'em around on his face or tries to eat them, you might wanna keep an eye on him. There's also initial approval of items made from natural products like wool, cotton, gemstones, etc. I'm still wondering how that applies to cotton that's dyed though...because a bunch of beige children running around is gonna look pretty weird and totalitarian. And
thrift shops & consignment shops are off the hook now too - sort of. They don't have to test the products they sell, but they still face civil/criminal penalties if caught selling items in violation of the new lead limit. What? My head hurts. Maybe it was all that licking the inside of the computer that I did earlier...
I'll be quiet now.
Five steps you can take to save natural/handmade companiesVote to amend the law on Change.orgLearning Resources blogHandmade Toy AllianceCPSIA Etsy Forums